Joseph Swingle is the executive managing director and market leader at Grubb & Ellis New York, New York, N.Y.
What are your predictions for commercial real estate in the new decade?
The market's recovery will be the event of the decade. A fundamental restructure of underwriting standards and valuation is already underway. Experienced investors once labeled conservative are now re-emerging as sages. Businesses are completely rethinking space use and how to structure future real estate commitments.Every default is an opportunity for new ownership, financing, management and market approach. Every large corporate shedding space offers an opportunity for an emerging business to secure a prime location unaffordable just two years ago. This evolutionary change is good for the industry, city and real estate providers who lend expertise at every stage of recovery.
When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:
Formal Legislative Role
• Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.