News: Spotlight Content

Commercial real estate investment sales outlook: Alphabet soup or a double dip?

For those of us who thrive on high transaction volume, perhaps we'd best enjoy 2010 while we can. Commercial real estate may double dip, even if the general economy doesn't. We've all heard theories about where the economy is headed which revolve around letters of the alphabet. Will the recovery will be V, U, or W shaped? A "V"-shaped recovery is the most optimistic, with a strong, sustained recovery which, the argument runs, has already begun. Less ebullient "U" theorists predict a longer trough punctuated by short sporadic upticks, until a sustained recovery takes hold. Most anxiety-provoking of all the letter theories is W. The prospect of a 'W" shaped recession, in which 2010 represents a short-lived growth period followed by another period of negative GDP, before a sustained recovery, is a worrisome one. While we've enjoyed increased transaction volume this year, tax-clouds are gathering on the horizon. Commercial real estate, if not other sectors, may be headed for a relative decline next year. Even if GDP is able to show some growth, commercial real estate and investment sales may well experience the "W," or double-dip, all by itself. Will upcoming tax changes that now seem inevitable be a wet blanket for real estate? Here is not the place to argue merits (or otherwise) of these changes, but the affect may be dampening. At the beginning of 2011, federal, state and local tax rates are scheduled to rise sharply. There isn't space here to list all the tax increases planned at the federal level and further down the government food chain, but the triple-punch of federal income, capital gains and carried-interest tax changes are enough to make the point. Bush-era tax cuts are due to expire at the end of this year, at least for the top two income brackets, the expiry will very likely happen. The highest personal income tax rate will go to 39.6% from 35%, and the capital gains rate to 20% from 15%. In addition, as of the date of this writing, a provision to change the tax treatment of "carried-interest" income by investment partnerships sits on the Senate floor (HR-4213). If passed, it will result in tax hike that will discourage commercial real estate ventures. Carried-interest is the portion of a fund's investment gains taken by managers as compensation. It is proposed that this income, which is currently taxed at the capital gains rate of 15%, will be treated as a mix of ordinary income and capital gains (at the higher, 2011 rates). Increased carried-interest taxes may make new real estate ventures in 2011 less attractive. Have investors who have a choice shifted income and capital gains out of next year? I suspect that these impending hikes will have encouraged some investors to close transactions in 2010 that otherwise might eventuate in 2011. This may have given a boost to business in 2010, but it's one that may have to be paid for next year. Structures such as charitable trusts and charitable remainder trusts, structured sales and installment sale strategies to lessen the capital gains blow may see increased usage for sellers who do not want to buy more real estate (and take advantage of a 1031 exchange) in years to come. On the bright side, available product supply may be affected more than demand, in that there will possibly be even fewer properties available for sale because of transaction loading in 2010 to avoid higher taxation. Fewer available properties for sale will keep prices stable in the coming year. The possible slowing for individual investors will be short lived, as sale decisions are not made due to taxation changes, only the timing may be accelerated. The income and carried interest changes may re-orient real estate players back toward longer-term investments with focus on generating income, as opposed to the trading orgy recent yore. There is plenty of money to be made on fundamentals. Carol Ann Flint is a senior director at Besen & Associates, New York, N.Y.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary