News: Spotlight Content

Capitalizing on the current depressed real estate market: Tax minimizing strategies for R.E. owners

Due to the current state of the economy and depressed real estate market, property values have fallen significantly. Now is the time when property owners need to reevaluate their real estate ownership tax structure. Many corporations own real estate in a corporate structure, which in most cases is not tax efficient. In addition to double taxation, property can be exposed to liability from corporate creditors. For example, a C-Corp which holds property may encounter liability and tax issues. The property may become subject to corporate creditors in claims of bankruptcy. Double taxation occurs because the appreciation of real property which is sold or transferred is taxed at a corporate rate and the subsequent distribution of the proceeds will also be taxed to the shareholders as a dividend. Let's take a look at an example: if you purchased a building for $100k and sold it for $1 million, you would have $900k profit. This profit will be taxed at the current federal corporate tax rate of 35%. In addition, proceeds that are distributed to the shareholders as a dividend will be taxed at 15%, the current capital gains rate. However, there are opportunities to shield the property from creditors and also avoid double taxation. Since property values are depressed, companies should consider distributing its real estate holdings to its shareholders. A distribution of property from a corporation to a shareholder is considered a deem sale of the asset by the corporation at its fair market value, regardless of whether or not proceeds are received. Therefore, if the property purchased has decreased in value, double taxation can be minimized or eliminated. After the property is transferred, any future appreciation will now be taxed at one level when and if the property is sold, preserving more of your initial investment. If the property is in held in an S-Corporation, shareholders are not exposed to double taxation. However, they can still benefit from this strategy. By removing the real estate from the corporate structure, it may be out of the creditors' reach. In addition, a number of Federal, State, and local individual and corporate tax rates will be increasing over the next few years. Transferring corporate property before any increase in the tax rates may be beneficial to your tax minimization strategy. Transferring your corporate property in this "soft" market can be beneficial to you and your shareholders. Speak with an advisor (accountant, attorney) to see if this strategy is right for you. If your property value is down, you may be able to retain a greater portion of your investment for the future. Jed Dallek, CPA, MST is a tax partner at Grassi & Co., CPAs, Lake Success, N.Y.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

NYREJ's 2026 Developing Long Island Spotlight Participation Options

This special section will feature projects completed within the past six months as well as projects that are currently under construction across Long Island, submitted by developers, general contractors, construction managers, and architectural firms. 
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
2026 Developing Queens: Long Island Board of Realtors  advances commercial growth and advocacy in Queens

2026 Developing Queens: Long Island Board of Realtors advances commercial growth and advocacy in Queens

The Long Island Board of Realtors (LIBOR) Commercial Network continues to play a key role in advancing opportunities and strengthening the commercial real estate landscape across Queens. Through targeted programming and global outreach
From vacancy to vitality: How adaptive reuse is reshaping Long Island’s CRE landscape - by Andrea Tsoukalas Curto

From vacancy to vitality: How adaptive reuse is reshaping Long Island’s CRE landscape - by Andrea Tsoukalas Curto

Adaptive reuse has become one of the most important conversations in commercial real estate today. Long Island has a large inventory of aging retail, office and industrial
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
CRE Guide Featured Company: Merritt Environmental Consulting Corp.

CRE Guide Featured Company: Merritt Environmental Consulting Corp.

Merritt Environmental Consulting Corp. (MECC) was established in June of 2009 after being part of a larger engineering firm for almost 20 years. The focus of the company is to assist lending institutions, attorneys, real estate investors, and property owners with environmental concerns. Today, MECC has offices in New York, Florida, and Vermont and has grown into a regional consulting firm serving clients along the East Coast.