News: Spotlight Content

Bruck of Time Equities closes 10 loans: $58.59 million

Stuart Bruck of Time Equities, Inc. has completed the closing of 10 loans totaling $58.59 million: * A $1.95 million loan secured by an apartment building. The loan has a 5 year term with an option for an additional 5 years. * A $5.8 million loan secured by four buildings on 127th and 128th St. near Convent Ave. in Harlem closed. The four buildings have a total of 91 apartments. The loan has an interest rate of 4%. * A $2.93 million mortgage secured by a six story elevatored apartment building located on the Grand Concourse in the Bronx. The building has 96 apartments and 5 stores. * A $3.3 million first mortgage loan was provided to the owner of two contiguous apartment buildings on 150th St. in Harlem between Broadway and Amsterdam Aves. The loan has an interest rate of 4% * A $2.4 million first mortgage from a L.I.-based lender. The loan is secured by a mortgage on a building on 42nd St. The building has 61 apartments. * A $5.25 million first mortgage secured by a 6-story apartment building with 2 elevators 68 parking spaces and 120 apartments recently closed. The building is located on Van Kleeck St. The lender reduced an existing pre-payment penalty which allowed the borrower to take advantage of current interest rates. * A $2 million first underlying mortgage was provided to a corporative apartment building on East 95th St., Manhattan. The loan has a term of 10 years with a current rate of 4.5% * A $5.5 million loan secured by a 4-story industrial building with a total of 120,000 s/f. The building is leased to a single tenant. The building is located on Austell Pl. * A $25 million credit line provided by major financial institution was structured with a $10 million unsecured portion with the balance of facility to be used for future real estate acquisitions. * A $4.4 million first mortgage secured by a 5-story apartment building with 2 elevators and 36 units closed. The loan featured a 10 year fixed rate loan at 4.2%.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.