News: Spotlight Content

25 Year Anniversary Q&A Blast from the Past: 1989: Barbara Champoux

Name: Barbara Champoux Title: Partner Company Name: Crowell & Moring LLP Year Founded: 1979 Years with Company: 5-1/2 years Years in real estate industry: 25 Q: The approximate number of years you have been a subscriber and/or how the NYREJ has been a benefit to you and/or your business. A: I have been a subscriber of NYREJ for approximately 11 years. NYREJ has been a great benefit to my business and commercial real estate endeavors, for many of the obvious reasons such as raising the profile of my firm in NY, as well as highlighting some of the transactional successes and professional milestones I have achieved. More importantly to me, however, NYREJ was among the first to provide a real and regular forum highlighting the achievements and activities of women in commercial real estate - not only those few who have already become titans and role models, but the many more who are advancing toward those goals and the organizations encouraging them. NYREJ has played a significant role in advancing women in CRE during its publishing "life", a mission which is near and dear to me. Q: The approximate year you discovered the NYREJ and what business you were in at the time: A: I discovered NYREJ approximately 12 years ago, at which point I was already in the commercial real estate field, and a relatively new partner in a law firm. Q: Your most memorable "15 minutes of fame" in the NYREJ: A: I have been very fortunate to have had several over the years, but among the ones I found most meaningful were the opportunities I had to provide monthly updates on the programs, goals and progress of NYCREW Network, the 1st New York chapter of CREW Network, as its President, a Board member and other leader - particularly in reporting on its various "DIG This" CREW Careers Programs designed to expose economically disadvantaged young women in New York City to the advantages and opportunities available in commercial real estate.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.