News: Brokerage

Retroactive tax benefits for real estate owners! Part 2

2012 TRA - For tax years beginning in 2012, the 2012 TRA increases the maximum deduction from $139,000 to $500,000. For the 2013 tax year, the act increases the maximum expensing amount from $25,000 to $500,000. Of importance, the 2012 TRA also increases the phase-out amount for both 2012 and 2013 to $2 million. In 2014, this temporary provision will sunset and the maximum deduction will return to $25,000 and the phase-out amount will reset back to $200,000. 15-Year Write-off for Qualified Leasehold, Retail and Restaurant Property Reinstated and Extended Section 1250 property that meets specific criteria could be classified as either qualified leasehold improvement property, qualified restaurant property or qualified retail improvement property, and could be recovered over a 15-year period using the straight line method. 2012 TRA - The act retroactively extends for two years the inclusion of qualified leasehold improvement property, qualified restaurant property and qualified retail improvement property in the 15-year MACRS class. Such property qualifies for 15-year recovery if it is placed in service before Jan. 1, 2014. Retirement of Structural Improvements: Ever since the end of the component depreciation system, owners have complained about a requirement to continue depreciating physically abandoned assets. Those of you who have been around for a while may recall that the component depreciation system conjoined the estimated useful life of an asset and its recovery period. This alleviated the concern of recording a loss on the retirement as long as the asset performed within its life expectancy. However, under the accelerated cost recovery system, the link between the estimated useful life and the recovery period was lost. This resulted in owners continuing to depreciate items that no longer exist. The roofs, windows and HVAC components do not last 39 years. To make matters worse, IRS guidance required owners to capitalize the costs of the replacement when these systems finally met the end of their useful life. This was not an issue under the component depreciation system if the system performed according to their specification. The system would be 100% depreciated when it was time for replacement. Fast forward . . . Under the new regulations, the IRS allows owners to write-off the un-depreciated portion of the retired components on a current and retroactive basis back to 1986. If you have a building and replaced a roof, boiler, or elevator over the last 15 years, you are still depreciating components that no longer exist. Therefore, the time has come to write-off all of the abandoned assets that have accumulated over time. If you retire an asset in 2012 or any future years, you are able to take the appropriate write-off in the relevant tax period. Open a Dialogue that Helps Defer Taxes: Since 2001, Congress has utilized depreciation related tax incentives to induce real estate owners to spend more, as a means to stimulate the economy. The 2012 TRA and the issuance of the new repairs and maintenance regulations earlier this year, which allows the write-off of retired structural components, is in line with this favorable tax strategy. With the top individual tax rates being reset to over 39% for 2013, and real estate tax incentives being reinstated for both 2012 and 2013, it is a perfect time for tax planning. Carefully balancing these incentives coupled with the ability to take advantage of the new repair and maintenance regulations through the use of cost segregation, opens the door to a productive conversation that can significantly benefit all parties. Mark de Stefanis, CCA, is president of Construction Cost Recovery, Inc., White Plains, N.Y.
MORE FROM Brokerage

NYSCAR June 2026 president’s message - by Mercedes Brien

As I write this letter, we are preparing to be at the Annual Conference being held at the Rivers Casino, Schenectady, New York. I look forward to reporting on the conference in my next letter. We have some great courses coming up via Zoom. Please be sure to keep watch on upcoming courses by visiting nyscar.org/resources and tools/professional development.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced